Difference between revisions of "Sigma Pro-Tech"
From Sega Retro
(∑ Pro-Tech not pulling in Softography template) |
m (Was Sigma Pro-Tech ''really'' not related to Sigma?) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==∑ Pro-Tech not pulling in Softography template== | ==∑ Pro-Tech not pulling in Softography template== | ||
| − | I don't think "∑ Pro-Tech" is pulling ''[[Zoom!]]'''s developer credit properly, but "Sigma Pro-Tech" does. Does this have anything to do with the Greek letter? | + | I don't think "∑ Pro-Tech" is pulling ''[[Zoom!]]'''s developer credit properly, but "Sigma Pro-Tech" does. Does this have anything to do with the Greek letter? (Also, check to see how Zoom! actually credits them.) |
*[[User:CartridgeCulture|CartridgeCulture]] ([[User talk:CartridgeCulture|talk]]) 07:03, 18 September 2021 (EDT) | *[[User:CartridgeCulture|CartridgeCulture]] ([[User talk:CartridgeCulture|talk]]) 07:03, 18 September 2021 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Was Sigma Pro-Tech ''really'' not related to Sigma?== | ||
| + | So the only source for them not being related is that developer interview, where he states "I don't -think- they were related." But this needs a lot more investigation... There are far too many coincidences here. Plus, virtually the only time Sigma Pro-Tech credited itself, it was as "Pro-Tech", as in, left out the Sigma cause it's already implied to be there? I don't know. Again, just needs more research, at the very least to definitively deny it. [[User:CartridgeCulture|CartridgeCulture]] ([[User talk:CartridgeCulture|talk]]) 21:25, 23 September 2021 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:25, 23 September 2021
∑ Pro-Tech not pulling in Softography template
I don't think "∑ Pro-Tech" is pulling Zoom!'s developer credit properly, but "Sigma Pro-Tech" does. Does this have anything to do with the Greek letter? (Also, check to see how Zoom! actually credits them.)
- CartridgeCulture (talk) 07:03, 18 September 2021 (EDT)
So the only source for them not being related is that developer interview, where he states "I don't -think- they were related." But this needs a lot more investigation... There are far too many coincidences here. Plus, virtually the only time Sigma Pro-Tech credited itself, it was as "Pro-Tech", as in, left out the Sigma cause it's already implied to be there? I don't know. Again, just needs more research, at the very least to definitively deny it. CartridgeCulture (talk) 21:25, 23 September 2021 (EDT)