Difference between revisions of "Marukatsu PC Engine"
From Sega Retro
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:*Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 9 :Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #68 | :*Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 9 :Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #68 | ||
:*Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 10:Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #71 | :*Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 10:Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #71 | ||
| − | ::Ah, then it sounds like a good idea to do a recount then. --[[User:SorachiJirachi|SorachiJirachi]] ([[User talk:SorachiJirachi|talk]]) 16:53, 15 May 2023 (EDT) | + | ::Ah, then it sounds like a good idea to do a recount then. I'll leave that to you. --[[User:SorachiJirachi|SorachiJirachi]] ([[User talk:SorachiJirachi|talk]]) 16:53, 15 May 2023 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:55, 15 May 2023
Numbering
We've got five scans of this magazine now, but they have different numbering from what is listed here. For example:
https://retrocdn.net/File:MarukatsuPCEngine_JP_70.pdf
The issue number at the top of the cover for the "January 1994" issue denotes that this is issue #70, yet on our list it's #61. Perhaps our issue list needs correcting? --SorachiJirachi (talk) 14:31, 15 May 2023 (EDT)
- Presumably, this is different because Marukatsu Mega Drive is included in the count as an extra issue of this magazine. In this case, should it be recounted as a missing number? -Akiyama Akane (talk) 16:31, 15 May 2023 (EDT)
- Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 1 :Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #46
- Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 2 :Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #49
- Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 3 :Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #52
- Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 4 :Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #55
- Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 5 :Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #58
- Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 6 :Unconfirmed.
- Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 7 :Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #64
- Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 8 :Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #66
- Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 9 :Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #68
- Marukatsu Mega Drive Vol. 10:Marukatsu PC Engine Extra issue #71
- Ah, then it sounds like a good idea to do a recount then. I'll leave that to you. --SorachiJirachi (talk) 16:53, 15 May 2023 (EDT)