Difference between revisions of "Office of Film and Literature Classification"

From Sega Retro

(Created page with " == OFLC was disbanded == The Australian government dissolved the OFLC in 2006 and the Classification Board and Classification Review Board were transferred to the Attorney-Gene...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
== OFLC was disbanded ==
 
== OFLC was disbanded ==
  
 
The Australian government dissolved the OFLC in 2006 and the Classification Board and Classification Review Board were transferred to the Attorney-General's Department. We might want to get this dealt with... [[User:BiafraRepublic|BiafraRepublic]] 23:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)
 
The Australian government dissolved the OFLC in 2006 and the Classification Board and Classification Review Board were transferred to the Attorney-General's Department. We might want to get this dealt with... [[User:BiafraRepublic|BiafraRepublic]] 23:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)
 +
 +
:Does the Attorney-General's Department use the same rating system, though? Because that's the point of this article; in that case it should be renamed or mirrored or something - [[User:Andlabs|Andlabs]] 23:35, 20 December 2011 (CST)
 +
 +
:: Yes, the Attorney-General's Department uses the same format for their Australian Classification Board.

Latest revision as of 14:44, 21 June 2014

OFLC was disbanded

The Australian government dissolved the OFLC in 2006 and the Classification Board and Classification Review Board were transferred to the Attorney-General's Department. We might want to get this dealt with... BiafraRepublic 23:26, 20 December 2011 (CST)

Does the Attorney-General's Department use the same rating system, though? Because that's the point of this article; in that case it should be renamed or mirrored or something - Andlabs 23:35, 20 December 2011 (CST)
Yes, the Attorney-General's Department uses the same format for their Australian Classification Board.