Difference between revisions of "Full Auto 2: Battlelines/Magazine articles"

From Sega Retro

m (Text replacement - "}} {{(.*)Omni}}" to "}} ==References== <references /> {{$1Omni}}")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
| title=EGM's Opinionated Preview Guide
 
| title=EGM's Opinionated Preview Guide
 
| comment=Quarter-page preview article. The game is given a verdict of "So-so".
 
| comment=Quarter-page preview article. The game is given a verdict of "So-so".
 +
}}
 +
{{magrow|next3|1|114
 +
| title=Next3Hype
 +
| comment=Preview article.
 +
}}
 +
{{magrow|egm|212|88
 +
| title=Reviews
 +
| comment=
 +
| version=NTSC-U
 +
| rating=6.5,6.0,6.5
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{magrow|gamepro|222|89
 
{{magrow|gamepro|222|89
Line 28: Line 38:
 
}}
 
}}
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 +
==References==
 +
<references />
  
 
{{FullAuto2Omni}}
 
{{FullAuto2Omni}}

Latest revision as of 14:01, 15 March 2022

PlayStation 3 version

Back to: Full Auto 2: Battlelines.
More...More...More...More...More...
File Date Source Title and comments
Logo-pdf.svg 2006-06-20 Electronic Gaming Monthly (US), "July 2006" "EGM's Opinionated Preview Guide"
Quarter-page preview article. The game is given a verdict of "So-so".
Logo-pdf.svg 2006-08-10 Next3 (UK), "Issue One" "Next3Hype"
Preview article.
Logo-pdf.svg 2007-01-16 Electronic Gaming Monthly (US), "February 2007" "Reviews"

Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
NTSC-U 6.5/10   6.0/10   6.5/10
63
[Info]
Logo-pdf.svg 2007-02-13 GamePro (US), "March 2007" "Reviews"

Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
NTSC-U 3.25/5
65
[Info]
Logo-pdf.svg 2007-03-14 Hyper (AU), "April 2007"
Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
PAL 78%
78
[Info]

PlayStation Portable version

Back to: Full Auto 2: Battlelines.
More...
File Date Source Title and comments
Logo-pdf.svg 2007-03-14 Hyper (AU), "April 2007"
Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
PAL 78%
78
[Info]

References


Full Auto 2: Battlelines

Full Auto 2 PS3 title.png

Main page | Comparisons | Credits | Hidden content | Development | Magazine articles | Reception


No results