Difference between revisions of "AKuHAK"
From Sega Retro
(Created page with "Though I'm not opposed to the point where I can be bothered to revert the edits, I don't think listing the GoodXXXX names of ROMs used in compilations is worthwhile. Those ROM...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This stuff is worth mentioning if the ROMs in question are "odd" in some way (e.g. a prototype or less common revision or something), but lists of names that ROMs were given a decade ago probably isn't all that useful. Same applies for No-intro or TOSEC or whatever. -[[User:Black Squirrel|Black Squirrel]] ([[User talk:Black Squirrel|talk]]) 13:46, 8 July 2013 (CDT) | This stuff is worth mentioning if the ROMs in question are "odd" in some way (e.g. a prototype or less common revision or something), but lists of names that ROMs were given a decade ago probably isn't all that useful. Same applies for No-intro or TOSEC or whatever. -[[User:Black Squirrel|Black Squirrel]] ([[User talk:Black Squirrel|talk]]) 13:46, 8 July 2013 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | What exactly do you mind? I ripped off all roms from the disk, extracted it, scanned with GoodTools which is updated recently (in 2012 December goodgen 3.21). Finally I got that some of the roms isn't mentioned in database. To my mind it is very useful information - we can found some missing roms, we can discover that some roms was changed for some reasons, we can see that these compilations uses some early beta prototypes. | ||
| + | But those games that are listed - technically they are verified and dumped from REAL hardware. It especially if they marked as [!] (verified) roms. So to my mind people have to know that they play EXACTLY that version of the game, which is discovered by me. | ||
| + | As for those phantasy star millenium dump - yeeees it is missing, There is some games that are missing and it is normal. In fact it is very difficult to find such a game that isnt included int goodtools. | ||
Revision as of 16:27, 8 July 2013
Though I'm not opposed to the point where I can be bothered to revert the edits, I don't think listing the GoodXXXX names of ROMs used in compilations is worthwhile. Those ROM lists are old and misinformed - names and regions are frequently wrong and some dumps are missing entirely. I suppose the fact they can't spell "Millennium" might be a clue that they're not very reliable.
This stuff is worth mentioning if the ROMs in question are "odd" in some way (e.g. a prototype or less common revision or something), but lists of names that ROMs were given a decade ago probably isn't all that useful. Same applies for No-intro or TOSEC or whatever. -Black Squirrel (talk) 13:46, 8 July 2013 (CDT)
What exactly do you mind? I ripped off all roms from the disk, extracted it, scanned with GoodTools which is updated recently (in 2012 December goodgen 3.21). Finally I got that some of the roms isn't mentioned in database. To my mind it is very useful information - we can found some missing roms, we can discover that some roms was changed for some reasons, we can see that these compilations uses some early beta prototypes. But those games that are listed - technically they are verified and dumped from REAL hardware. It especially if they marked as [!] (verified) roms. So to my mind people have to know that they play EXACTLY that version of the game, which is discovered by me. As for those phantasy star millenium dump - yeeees it is missing, There is some games that are missing and it is normal. In fact it is very difficult to find such a game that isnt included int goodtools.