Difference between revisions of "Stormlord/Development"
From Sega Retro
(Created page with "See the problem is, we started information on game history before the concept of sub-pages was even a thing. I think the history sub-pages can probably go, to be replaced wit...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I think the history sub-pages can probably go, to be replaced with: | I think the history sub-pages can probably go, to be replaced with: | ||
*[[Stormlord/Development]] (for development) | *[[Stormlord/Development]] (for development) | ||
| − | *[[Stormlord/Release]] (for... the release | + | *[[Stormlord/Release]] (for... the release period? We might not need this) |
*[[Stormlord/Legacy]] | *[[Stormlord/Legacy]] | ||
but obviously if one or more of those subjects can't justify their own sub-pages, leave it on the main page. It might require more thought -[[User:Black Squirrel|Black Squirrel]] ([[User talk:Black Squirrel|talk]]) 12:20, 12 June 2022 (EDT) | but obviously if one or more of those subjects can't justify their own sub-pages, leave it on the main page. It might require more thought -[[User:Black Squirrel|Black Squirrel]] ([[User talk:Black Squirrel|talk]]) 12:20, 12 June 2022 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:20, 12 June 2022
See the problem is, we started information on game history before the concept of sub-pages was even a thing.
I think the history sub-pages can probably go, to be replaced with:
- Stormlord/Development (for development)
- Stormlord/Release (for... the release period? We might not need this)
- Stormlord/Legacy
but obviously if one or more of those subjects can't justify their own sub-pages, leave it on the main page. It might require more thought -Black Squirrel (talk) 12:20, 12 June 2022 (EDT)