Difference between revisions of "Sega Digio II"
From Sega Retro
(Credibility of Digio II) |
NiktheGreek (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Continuation of {{LinkRetro|topic=20380|title=this topic}}. - [[User:Andlabs|Andlabs]] 03:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | Continuation of {{LinkRetro|topic=20380|title=this topic}}. - [[User:Andlabs|Andlabs]] 03:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === Request for deletion === | ||
+ | That's a quick edit of a '''Nintendo 64''' cartridge, is there really any more to say? | ||
+ | |||
+ | If something looks blatantly fake, uploading it first and ''then'' questioning its legitimacy can turn any wiki in a fanart slideshow. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:ICEknight|ICEknight]] 08:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Adding my call to delete this as well. This cannot be verified and what little information we do have is not reliable in the slightest. | ||
+ | |||
+ | -- [[User:NiktheGreek|NiktheGreek]] 17:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:56, 8 April 2010
Credibility of Digio II
Continuation of
this topic. - Andlabs 03:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Request for deletion
That's a quick edit of a Nintendo 64 cartridge, is there really any more to say?
If something looks blatantly fake, uploading it first and then questioning its legitimacy can turn any wiki in a fanart slideshow.
--ICEknight 08:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Adding my call to delete this as well. This cannot be verified and what little information we do have is not reliable in the slightest.
-- NiktheGreek 17:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)