Difference between revisions of "History of Sega in the CIS"
From Sega Retro
(Created page with "So why are we maintaining three copies of the same page? *History of Sega in Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova *History of Sega in Caucasian States *History of Sega in...") |
m (Black Squirrel moved page Talk:History of Sega in Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova to Talk:History of Sega in the CIS) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
if the history is the same, would it not be better to have a "History of Sega in the CIS" page? -[[User:Black Squirrel|Black Squirrel]] ([[User talk:Black Squirrel|talk]]) 07:32, 23 December 2017 (CST) | if the history is the same, would it not be better to have a "History of Sega in the CIS" page? -[[User:Black Squirrel|Black Squirrel]] ([[User talk:Black Squirrel|talk]]) 07:32, 23 December 2017 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I was thinking the same as you but the problem was where should the article be attributed to Asia or Europe?That's why there are so many the same articles-[[User:Lukdriver14|Lukdriver14]] ([[Lukdriver14|talk]]) 8:31, 23 December 2017 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:42, 23 December 2017
So
why are we maintaining three copies of the same page?
- History of Sega in Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova
- History of Sega in Caucasian States
- History of Sega in Central Asia
if the history is the same, would it not be better to have a "History of Sega in the CIS" page? -Black Squirrel (talk) 07:32, 23 December 2017 (CST)
I was thinking the same as you but the problem was where should the article be attributed to Asia or Europe?That's why there are so many the same articles-Lukdriver14 (talk) 8:31, 23 December 2017 (CST)