Difference between revisions of "Hi-Octane/Magazine articles"

From Sega Retro

Line 26: Line 26:
 
| version=PAL
 
| version=PAL
 
| rating=90
 
| rating=90
 +
}}
 +
{{magrow|mms|39|63
 +
| title=
 +
| comment=
 +
| version=PAL
 +
| rating=90
 +
| awards=megagame
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{magrow|cvg|170|36
 
{{magrow|cvg|170|36

Revision as of 15:00, 18 July 2020

Back to: Hi-Octane.
More...More...More...More...More...More...More...More...More...More...More...
File Date Source Title and comments
Logo-pdf.svg 1995-08-11 Computer & Video Games (UK), "September 1995"
Logo-pdf.svg 1995-08-25 Mean Machines Sega (UK), "October 1995" "Work in Progress"
Logo-pdf.svg 1995-11-xx Maximum (UK), "November 1995"
Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
RatingStar Full.svgRatingStar Full.svgRatingStar Empty.svgRatingStar Empty.svgRatingStar Empty.svg
25
[Info]
Logo-pdf.svg 1995-1x-xx Mega Force (FR), "Décembre 1995"

Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
PAL 77%
77
[Info]
Logo-pdf.svg 1995-11-24 Sega Saturn Magazine (UK), "December 1995"
Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
PAL 90%
90
[Info]
Logo-pdf.svg 1995-11-xx Mean Machines Sega (UK), "January 1996"

Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
PAL 90% Mega Game
90
[Info]
Logo-pdf.svg 1995-12-10 Computer & Video Games (UK), "January 1996"

Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
81%
81
[Info]
Logo-pdf.svg 1996-03-08 Sega Saturn Magazine (JP), "1996-05 (1996-03-22)" "Sega Saturn soft review"

Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
NTSC-J 6/10   5/10   4/10
50
[Info]
Logo-pdf.svg 1996-03-12 Sega Pro (RU), "Mart 1996"
Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
79%
79
[Info]
1996-03-15 Famitsu (JP), "1996-03-29" "Cross review"

Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
NTSC-J 6/10   4/10   6/10   6/10
55
[Info]
Logo-pdf.svg 2000-03 Sega Saturn Magazine (JP), "Readers rating final data" "Sega Saturn Magazine (JP) readers final rating"

Review
Version Rating Awards Calculated score
NTSC-J 4.7391/10
47
[Info]


Hi-Octane

HiOctane title.png

Main page | Comparisons | Development | Magazine articles | Video coverage | Reception | Technical information


No results