Difference between revisions of "Stormlord/Development"
From Sega Retro
m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
but obviously if one or more of those subjects can't justify their own sub-pages, leave it on the main page. It might require more thought -[[User:Black Squirrel|Black Squirrel]] ([[User talk:Black Squirrel|talk]]) 12:20, 12 June 2022 (EDT) | but obviously if one or more of those subjects can't justify their own sub-pages, leave it on the main page. It might require more thought -[[User:Black Squirrel|Black Squirrel]] ([[User talk:Black Squirrel|talk]]) 12:20, 12 June 2022 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Thank you, this kind of insight is super super useful. I'll give it further thought as well but I think you hit the nail on the head with this. [[User:CartridgeCulture|CartridgeCulture]] ([[User talk:CartridgeCulture|talk]]) 12:54, 12 June 2022 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:54, 12 June 2022
See the problem is, we started information on game history before the concept of sub-pages was even a thing.
I think the history sub-pages can probably go, to be replaced with:
- Stormlord/Development (for development)
- Stormlord/Release (for... the release period? We might not need this)
- Stormlord/Legacy
but obviously if one or more of those subjects can't justify their own sub-pages, leave it on the main page. It might require more thought -Black Squirrel (talk) 12:20, 12 June 2022 (EDT)
- Thank you, this kind of insight is super super useful. I'll give it further thought as well but I think you hit the nail on the head with this. CartridgeCulture (talk) 12:54, 12 June 2022 (EDT)