Difference between revisions of "Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis"
From Sega Retro
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{UnreleasedBob |
| bobscreen= | | bobscreen= | ||
− | |||
− | |||
| publisher=[[JVC]] | | publisher=[[JVC]] | ||
| developer=[[LucasArts]] | | developer=[[LucasArts]] | ||
Line 12: | Line 10: | ||
| genre=Adventure | | genre=Adventure | ||
| vrc=ga | | vrc=ga | ||
+ | | date=1993 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{sub-stub}} | {{sub-stub}} | ||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
An enhanced version was announced for the [[Sega Mega-CD]], featuring at [[Summer CES 1993]], but was cancelled before release. It is thought LucasArts' decision to axe the title was due to poor sales of the Mega-CD version of ''[[The Secret of Monkey Island]]'', although screenshots, media coverage and a [[VRC]] rating suggest that development of the port was in its advanced stages before the decision was made. | An enhanced version was announced for the [[Sega Mega-CD]], featuring at [[Summer CES 1993]], but was cancelled before release. It is thought LucasArts' decision to axe the title was due to poor sales of the Mega-CD version of ''[[The Secret of Monkey Island]]'', although screenshots, media coverage and a [[VRC]] rating suggest that development of the port was in its advanced stages before the decision was made. | ||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 12:06, 24 July 2015
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis |
---|
System(s): Sega Mega-CD |
Publisher: JVC |
Developer: LucasArts |
Planned release date(s): 1993 |
Genre: Adventure |
Number of players: 1 |
This teeny-tiny article needs some work. You can help us by expanding it.
Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis is an adventure game based on the Indiana Jones franchise, developed and published by LucasArts in 1992.
An enhanced version was announced for the Sega Mega-CD, featuring at Summer CES 1993, but was cancelled before release. It is thought LucasArts' decision to axe the title was due to poor sales of the Mega-CD version of The Secret of Monkey Island, although screenshots, media coverage and a VRC rating suggest that development of the port was in its advanced stages before the decision was made.