Difference between revisions of "Porttable"
From Sega Retro
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
: I'm thinking it could also be displayed like a flowchart, possibly with tabs for switching between flowchart/treelist views. - [[User:Hivebrain|Hivebrain]] ([[User talk:Hivebrain|talk]]) 11:17, 24 December 2018 (CST) | : I'm thinking it could also be displayed like a flowchart, possibly with tabs for switching between flowchart/treelist views. - [[User:Hivebrain|Hivebrain]] ([[User talk:Hivebrain|talk]]) 11:17, 24 December 2018 (CST) | ||
+ | ::Yeah I was throwing things around to see what would stick | ||
+ | ::Would we ever have a "2" - I'm thinking that if multiple versions can't be traced back to the same developer/publisher, it's probably a different game, and so would need a different page. | ||
+ | ::Also not sure at all how we'd do auto-generated fancy diagrams through Mediawiki. My hope is that the trees would never get more complex than in the above example - you don't usually see games sub-sub-licensed (unless there's seomthing I'm not thinking of?) -[[User:Black Squirrel|Black Squirrel]] ([[User talk:Black Squirrel|talk]]) 14:44, 24 December 2018 (EST) |
Revision as of 15:44, 24 December 2018
Test
Porttable |
---|
System(s): Sega System 16, Sega Mega Drive, Sega System E, Sega Mega-Tech, B-System, Taito H-System |
Publisher: AcademySoft-ELORG Atari Games Sega Tengen Sega |
Developer: Alexey Pajitnov Sanritsu |
Genre: Puzzle |
Bearing in mind this is an extreme case -->
Alternatively:
Publisher(s) | Developer(s) |
---|---|
AcademySoft-ELORG Mirrorsoft Atari Games Sega Tengen Sega |
Alexey Pajitnov Sega Sanritsu |
-Black Squirrel (talk) 05:35, 24 December 2018 (CST)
- The branches don't quite make sense. You have 2.2 without a 2. It should work more like this:
1 1.1 1.2 1.2.1 2 2.1 2.1.1
- I'm thinking it could also be displayed like a flowchart, possibly with tabs for switching between flowchart/treelist views. - Hivebrain (talk) 11:17, 24 December 2018 (CST)
- Yeah I was throwing things around to see what would stick
- Would we ever have a "2" - I'm thinking that if multiple versions can't be traced back to the same developer/publisher, it's probably a different game, and so would need a different page.
- Also not sure at all how we'd do auto-generated fancy diagrams through Mediawiki. My hope is that the trees would never get more complex than in the above example - you don't usually see games sub-sub-licensed (unless there's seomthing I'm not thinking of?) -Black Squirrel (talk) 14:44, 24 December 2018 (EST)