Difference between revisions of "Ertzui"
From Sega Retro
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
By the way here is a link to the japanese wiki entries of the "Soshite" games. Data East is clearly labled as the overall developer not just publicher. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revive_%E3%80%9C%E8%98%87%E7%94%9F%E3%80%9C | By the way here is a link to the japanese wiki entries of the "Soshite" games. Data East is clearly labled as the overall developer not just publicher. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revive_%E3%80%9C%E8%98%87%E7%94%9F%E3%80%9C | ||
: ''[[Hundred Swords]]'' is developed by Smilebit (a division of Sega), and Sega's logo is all over the PC version's covers. I checked the (archived) developer websites for ''[[Doukoku Soshite...]]'' and they seem to be correct. In fact, your own edit to the production credits lists Sakata SAS and Studio Line as developers. ''Revive'' is also listed on [https://web.archive.org/web/20000929162451/http://www.sas-sakata.co.jp/works.html Sakata SAS's website], but it's entirely possible Data East should also be listed as a developer. We'd need to see the full credits to know for sure. - [[User:Hivebrain|Hivebrain]] ([[User talk:Hivebrain|talk]]) 19:33, 26 January 2020 (EST) | : ''[[Hundred Swords]]'' is developed by Smilebit (a division of Sega), and Sega's logo is all over the PC version's covers. I checked the (archived) developer websites for ''[[Doukoku Soshite...]]'' and they seem to be correct. In fact, your own edit to the production credits lists Sakata SAS and Studio Line as developers. ''Revive'' is also listed on [https://web.archive.org/web/20000929162451/http://www.sas-sakata.co.jp/works.html Sakata SAS's website], but it's entirely possible Data East should also be listed as a developer. We'd need to see the full credits to know for sure. - [[User:Hivebrain|Hivebrain]] ([[User talk:Hivebrain|talk]]) 19:33, 26 January 2020 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | No, the production credits lists Sakata SAS as only the programmers, meaning the pure codeing. Sakata SAS is not a real developer its a subdivision of SAS specialized in coding. They have nothing to do with any other parts of the development. Which makes sense since they not even listed anywhere on the boxart nor on the title screen of the game, which should be the case if you are the developer of a game. Now Studio Rain actually can be credited as part-developer since this seems to be a joint-venture project between them and DataEast hence the term Cooperation. They also have their copyright in and on the game (just like DataEast). So the correct way for the developer section would be: "DataEast, Studio Line". Sakata SAS is just the coding section. | ||
Revision as of 20:03, 26 January 2020
The PC version of Snow apparently has nothing to do with Sega, so it won't be covered by this wiki. - Hivebrain (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2020 (EST)
The PC version of Hundred Swords also has nothing to do with Sega like a bunch of other pc versions listed in other entries, so why are they listed? By the way here is a link to the japanese wiki entries of the "Soshite" games. Data East is clearly labled as the overall developer not just publicher. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revive_%E3%80%9C%E8%98%87%E7%94%9F%E3%80%9C
- Hundred Swords is developed by Smilebit (a division of Sega), and Sega's logo is all over the PC version's covers. I checked the (archived) developer websites for Doukoku Soshite... and they seem to be correct. In fact, your own edit to the production credits lists Sakata SAS and Studio Line as developers. Revive is also listed on Sakata SAS's website, but it's entirely possible Data East should also be listed as a developer. We'd need to see the full credits to know for sure. - Hivebrain (talk) 19:33, 26 January 2020 (EST)
No, the production credits lists Sakata SAS as only the programmers, meaning the pure codeing. Sakata SAS is not a real developer its a subdivision of SAS specialized in coding. They have nothing to do with any other parts of the development. Which makes sense since they not even listed anywhere on the boxart nor on the title screen of the game, which should be the case if you are the developer of a game. Now Studio Rain actually can be credited as part-developer since this seems to be a joint-venture project between them and DataEast hence the term Cooperation. They also have their copyright in and on the game (just like DataEast). So the correct way for the developer section would be: "DataEast, Studio Line". Sakata SAS is just the coding section.