Thepirategamefan

about some of the articles you created and edited

hi, some of the articles you've created about unlicensed game companies don't seem to really exist. i actually know quite a bit about pirate/unlicensed games myself, and furthermore, searching google for any evidence that the stuff you wrote actually existed, i'm inclined to believe that some of the stuff you wrote/edited thus far is just some fantasy dream stuff you came up with because you like unlicensed/pirate games and certain modern western cartoons (like my little pony: friendship is magic, perhaps?) and sonic and... well, yeah.

problem is, this site is meant for documenting [sega-related] stuff that's known to have been seen, bought, played and experienced, things that have been written down more than once in history -- i.e. things that actually exist in real life. even andlabs, one of the moderator of this wiki, has taken the stuff you wrote with a "grain of salt", so to speak.

i'm just wondering: are you really making all this stuff up in your mind or something? i'd really like to know. like i said, this wiki is supposed to be aiming for concreate facts, validation and proof of existence. if you can prove, for example that a "gumball" genesis pirate by gametec actually exists, or that sun green is an actual pirate company that made unlicensed sonic games, please feel free to give me some proof.

sorry if i offended you or anything like that, but that's just the way it goes. --Uno10 (talk) 17:44, 31 July 2013 (CDT)

MeiShu Inc. seems to be full of unverifiable stuff too. Unfortunately no response was made to my request for a source on the discussion page two weeks ago. I'm inclined to share Uno10's view. --Pirate Dragon (talk) 17:57, 31 July 2013 (CDT)

I'd love a dump of Tails the Sailor

But yes I question some of these edits/pages as well - not to say it's impossible that these things exist, but when we're working with stuff that hasn't been documented before, evidence is nice. Also space bars. -Black Squirrel (talk) 06:49, 1 August 2013 (CDT)

Some of the things he's written have the veneer of plausibility, other things are outright absurd. Without evidence, or even a response to concerns on this talk page, I don't think we can keep any of his contributions. - Hivebrain (talk) 19:37, 2 August 2013 (CDT)

please stop

sorry but this isn't your happy make-believe wiki. --Uno10 (talk) 14:06, 5 August 2013 (CDT)

Nah,its fun--Thepirategamefan (talk) 14:23, 5 August 2013 (CDT)

...what --Uno10 (talk) 14:52, 5 August 2013 (CDT)

i love my the things i do,eventually--Thepirategamefan (talk) 14:57, 5 August 2013 (CDT)

...have fun then, i guess??? don't be surprised if you get yourself banned --Uno10 (talk) 14:58, 5 August 2013 (CDT)

Yes, final warning: we do not allow people to deliberately make up stuff. If you are genuinely unsure if something is by someone in particular, feel free to ask (on the talk page if you can't find any references on the internet; I will say I have disassembled Super Mario World 64's code and it does not look like anything by Creaton Softech). And if you have genuine information to contribute, feel free to contribute it. But cut the fake stuff out now, please, or you will be banned. Sorry, and thanks. - Andlabs (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2013 (CDT)